Margaret Atwood’s First Film Adaptation Remains an ’80s Misfire Worth Revisiting

Atwood later enjoyed The Handmaid’s Tale television series, which expanded the novel into six seasons running from 2017 to 2025, MSN reported. That longer form changed the job. The series could let relationships develop, return to earlier wounds and give performers more than one note to play.

Time also changes where the money lands. A film concentrates its gamble in one release, one campaign and one cast expected to make the whole machine work at once. A long-running series spreads that risk across years of work, with writers, crews and actors returning to the same world. The people carrying the production get more chances to build a person instead of announcing one.

This does not make the movie worthless. It makes its rough edges easier to read. The film is a snapshot of what the industry thought could fit inside a single adaptation, while the series shows what became possible when the format made room for accumulation.

Photos: Collision Conf · CC BY 2.0 · source; Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación Argentina · CC BY-SA 2.0 · source

Atwood’s darker future found a different dead end

The same problem appears in Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy, which nearly became an HBO series. In 2014, filmmaker Darren Aronofsky was reported to be planning an adaptation of Oryx and Crake, The Year of the Flood and MaddAddam. Playwright and television writer Eliza Clark was hired to adapt the books.

The trilogy imagines a corporate world where genetic engineering creates hybrid animals before a global pandemic nearly wipes out humanity. The books move among different viewpoints, then bring their characters together. The first follows the Snowman, apparently the last human alive, and the small engineered people he calls Crakers. His past includes Jimmy, his friendship with Crake and his relationship with Oryx, whose history as an enslaved child is among the trilogy’s harshest material.

Aronofsky told Vulture that Clark faced the challenge of shaping the massive story into a 10-episode series. In 2016, reports said the HBO project was not moving forward. A decade later, it still has not happened.

Photos: Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación Argentina · CC BY-SA 2.0 · source; ActuaLitté · CC BY-SA 2.0 · source

The failed projects leave a clear lesson

Atwood’s adaptations keep making the same demand: do not confuse a large idea with an easy one. The Crakers and hybrid animals offer images a filmmaker can build, but much of MaddAddam lives inside the characters’ heads. Jimmy’s story depends on flashbacks, and Oryx’s past asks a production to handle suffering without turning it into decoration.

That is why the old Handmaid’s Tale movie remains worth revisiting. Not because it secretly solved the novel, and not because disappointment should be polished into praise. It shows the cost of asking one film to carry a book whose deepest action happens where no camera can go. The red costume is visible. The mind inside it is the harder part.

Every factual claim above is drawn from these. The reading of them is ours.