CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
Sign inJoin
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesWatchCriticsWritersStatsAboutEditorial StandardsContactPrivacyTermsRSS

CinePixo — a home for film-critic fandom.Built, filled and argued over by this community — the library, the artwork we license and host, the taxonomy and every signed review grow here, together.

About CinePixo

We grew up on Ebert reviews.

CinePixo is a fandom home for people who love film criticism as much as film — who read the review after the credits, argue about half-stars, and believe a great piece of writing can change how you see a movie.

01

We write reviews

Every member can publish. Long-form, markdown, no algorithmic feed deciding what matters.

02

We argue in stars

Ratings with distributions, not just averages — a 4.8 that splits the room is more interesting than one that doesn't.

03

We honor the critics

Profiles for the writers and voices who taught this fandom how to watch.

How this works

What is CinePixo?
CinePixo is an independent, English-language site for film criticism. Members publish long-form, signed reviews of individual films, and each review carries a rating and a one-line verdict. Alongside the writing there is a film library with full credits and a directory of the critics the community follows.
How does the CinePixo rating scale work?
Reviews are scored from 0 to 10 in half-point steps and displayed on a five-star scale, so 9.5 out of 10 is shown as four and three-quarter stars. Half-points exist because the distance between a 7 and an 8 is where most disagreement actually lives.
What is a fandom score?
The fandom score for a film is the plain average of every published review's rating for it — no weighting, no secret formula. It is shown together with the distribution, because an average of four stars that splits the room is a different film from one that doesn't.
How is the top-rated ranking calculated?
Films are ranked by average rating weighted by review count, using avg × n/(n+2). The weighting means a single enthusiastic review cannot outrank a film that many writers have argued for.
What are themes and motifs here?
A theme is what a film is about — a class divide, the cost of ambition. A motif is what recurs on screen — stairs, rising water, a rehearsal room. Both are editorial: the axis, its definition and the sentence explaining how it shows up in a particular film are written by members of this site, and a film joins an axis only with that sentence attached. Imported keyword lists are shown separately and labelled as such.
What is Off Camera, and how is it different from a review?
Off Camera is the CinePixo blog: film writing that is not a review. A review argues about one film and carries a score; a blog post covers what a review has no room for — what the people who make films are doing away from the film, an argument the industry is having, how a picture was made, or what to watch next. Posts carry no rating, by design. They are written by the editorial desk rather than by any member.
How does CinePixo source what it writes about real people?
Every blog post filed under Away From Set or The Argument lists the sources its factual claims rest on, and the page prints all of them. This is enforced in the database, not left to good intentions: a post in either of those categories cannot be published with an empty source list. The reading of the sources is ours; the underlying facts belong to whoever we cited, and corrections are welcome at the contact address.
Who can publish a review on CinePixo?
Any member with an account can publish. Reviews are written in Markdown, signed with the author's name, and are not ordered by an algorithmic feed — the index is chronological and the rankings are stated arithmetic.
Where does the film data come from?
From open knowledge bases, through our own import tooling: film facts from Wikidata and synopses from Wikipedia, credited under their licence on each film page. Artwork is hosted on our own origin — freely licensed files with their credit, and film posters shown for identification, which remain © their studios. Reviews and ratings are the work of their authors.

The critics we celebrate

Andrew SarrisAndré BazinJonathan RosenbaumJung Sung-ilManny FarberMolly HaskellPauline KaelRoger EbertSusan Sontag

The fine print

CinePixo is independently run. Questions, corrections, takedown requests: devoh@signpost.kr.

The library is built with our own tooling: film facts come from open knowledge bases (Wikidata; synopses from Wikipedia, credited under their licence on each page), and the artwork is hosted on our own origin — freely licensed files carry their credit, and film posters are shown for identification and remain © their studios. The taxonomy, the criticism and the code grow here — with this community. Reviews and ratings are the work of their authors.

Writing about real people carries an extra obligation, so Off Camera posts about a person or a live argument list their sources on the page — and cannot be published without at least one. If we have a fact wrong, tell us at the address above and we will correct it and say that we did.

Our source hierarchy, first-hand evidence rules, automation policy, disclosures and corrections process are published in the Editorial Standards.

Your take belongs here.

Create an accountRead the reviews first