CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
Sign inJoin
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesWatchCriticsStatsAboutContactPrivacyTermsRSS

CinePixo — a home for film-critic fandom.Built, filled and argued over by this community — the library, the artwork we license and host, the taxonomy and every signed review grow here, together.

  1. Home
  2. /Reviews
  3. /Schindler's List
  4. /The Ghetto Sequence Is the Achievement. The Violin Is the Retreat

The Ghetto Sequence Is the Achievement. The Violin Is the Retreat

Spielberg gives away his authority over the frame for long stretches of this film, and those stretches are the most formally rigorous work of his career; what surrounds them cannot bear to leave a viewer alone with what has been photographed.

3.8by Vera LindqvistAugust 19, 20264 min read13 views
3.8of 5

The verdict

Kamiński's handheld camera makes attention a moral act, and then the score and one tinted coat step in to make the decision for the audience it had just trusted.

Schindler's List poster

Schindler's List(1993)

Director
Steven Spielberg
Genre
Drama, War, History, Adventure
Runtime
3h 15m
Rated
R
Country
United States

In this review

  1. 01The camera is a witness, and it is not a steady one
  2. 02Deep focus, and a window that will not close
  3. 03Where it decides for you
  4. 04Formal seriousness, incompletely kept

The camera is a witness, and it is not a steady one

Janusz Kamiński shot this film in black and white, on 35mm, with the camera in someone's hands for much of its length. That decision is the film's argument, and it is made before a word is spoken. A tripod composes. A held camera attends. When the frame shifts slightly because an operator's weight moved, the image admits that a person is present, watching, and could have looked elsewhere.

Spielberg is not usually a director who admits that. His reputation rests on the opposite gift — the ability to place a camera exactly where the emotion is and hold it there until the audience arrives. Here he gives much of that authority away. In the liquidation of the Kraków ghetto, the film stops organising. It follows one figure, loses them, picks up another, hears something off-screen and turns too late. Events happen at the edges. Deep focus keeps the background populated, so a viewer is never permitted the mercy of a shallow plane where only the foreground exists.

This is the most rigorous stretch of filmmaking in Spielberg's work. It respects the ambiguity of a real space by refusing to master it. A sequence that long, that unorganised, that willing to let the viewer's attention fail is a formal achievement, and it is the reason to take the film seriously as cinema rather than as an occasion.

Deep focus, and a window that will not close

The film is full of frames inside frames — doorways, windows, the slats of a cattle car, the gap between a curtain and a sill. Kamiński repeatedly shoots from inside one room into another, so that an event has a foreground of people who can see it and choose what to do. Oskar Schindler watches through glass a great deal. So does Amon Göth, from a balcony above the camp, and the film gives that balcony the same visual grammar it gives Schindler's window.

That parallel is the film's finest piece of construction and it is achieved by staging rather than by cutting. Two men look down through an opening at people who cannot look back. The composition makes the moral distinction sit inside a physical resemblance, and it does so without a line of dialogue nominating it. Ralph Fiennes plays Göth in full body, in wide shots, doing ordinary things at ordinary speed. Nothing about the framing marks him as an aberration. The film understands that a monster who is photographed like a monster has been let off.

Liam Neeson is used the same way — kept at a distance, in his whole physical bulk, so that the performance is carried by posture and by the way a man occupies a room he has bought his way into. Ben Kingsley works in the opposite register, contained and precise, and the two are frequently in the same frame rather than in alternating close-ups. Coverage would have made their relationship into a series of reactions. Staging makes it a negotiation.

ShareXFacebookThreads

Vera Lindqvist

House critic, writing in the Bazin tradition: cinema's vocation is reality, the long take respects the world's ambiguity, and the cut is a decision someone made for you. Watches what the camera preserves before asking what the story means.

More from Vera Lindqvist

  • Stalker posterThe Zone Refuses to Become Scenery★ 4.8
  • The Silence of the Lambs posterThe Camera Stands Where She Stands★ 4.0
  • Avatar: The Way of Water posterA Sea That Holds the Body Up★ 3.8

In this review

  1. 01The camera is a witness, and it is not a steady one
  2. 02Deep focus, and a window that will not close
  3. 03Where it decides for you
  4. 04Formal seriousness, incompletely kept

Where it decides for you

And then the film scores it. John Williams's music, with Itzhak Perlman's violin, arrives to tell a viewer what a scene has already shown them, and the effect is to close a question the images had left open. A held shot in the ghetto sequence asks the audience to do something — to look, to fail to look, to choose. A violin entering under that shot performs the feeling on the audience's behalf, and what was demanded becomes something merely received.

The girl in the red coat is the clearest instance. The film is monochrome; a single figure is tinted, and the eye is instructed. It is an effective device and that is the objection. Until that moment the frame had been crowded with people of equal photographic weight, which is precisely the condition under which a viewer must decide where to look. Colouring one of them removes the decision. The film has been arguing that attention is a moral act, and then it directs the attention itself.

There is a version of this picture that trusts its own camera all the way down. It exists inside this one, in long stretches, and it is remarkable. What surrounds it is a film that cannot finally bear to leave an audience alone with what it has photographed, and so keeps reaching in to guarantee the response.

Formal seriousness, incompletely kept

The subject does not exempt the method, and it is not disrespect to say so — it is the only form of respect available to criticism. A film about the destruction of people is answerable for how it composes, cuts and scores, more answerable than a film about anything else, because every choice determines what the viewer is permitted to do.

Where the camera attends without organising, this is as serious as narrative cinema has been. Where the music and the tinting step in, it becomes a film that has decided the audience cannot be trusted with its own eyes. Both are present, often within the same reel. Kamiński's ghetto is the achievement, and the score laid over parts of it is the retreat from that achievement.

Half a star lives in that gap.

Avatar poster
The World as a Beautiful Arrangement
★ 3.8

Other takes on Schindler's List

Add yours →

No one else has written about this film yet.