CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
Sign inJoin
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesWatchCriticsWritersStatsAboutEditorial StandardsContactPrivacyTermsRSS

CinePixo — a home for film-critic fandom.Built, filled and argued over by this community — the library, the artwork we license and host, the taxonomy and every signed review grow here, together.

  1. Home
  2. /Off Camera
  3. /The Argument
  4. /Gal Gadot Backs AI ‘Bitcoin’ and Nears a Wonder Woman Exit
The ArgumentEditorial feature

Gal Gadot Backs AI ‘Bitcoin’ and Nears a Wonder Woman Exit

Gadot says actors must work with AI or leave the game, though she spent six months shielding her own performance from it. She also says another Wonder Woman film no longer fits her life.

by Dorothy KwanSeptember 7, 20265 min read11 views
Casey Affleck and Chloe Zhao in the background during at Q&A at Telluride Film Festival 2023
Casey Affleck and Chloe Zhao in the background during at Q&A at Telluride Film Festival 2023 · Jennifer 8. Lee (CC BY-SA 4.0)

In this piece

  1. 01Gal Gadot protects her performance, but AI gets the room
  2. 02Doug Liman’s $70 million gray box promises 200 locations
  3. 03Bitcoin reopens the Craig Wright argument Hollywood cannot settle
  4. 04Wonder Woman no longer fits Gadot’s life

Gal Gadot defended starring in Doug Liman’s AI-assisted thriller Bitcoin in an interview reported August 31 and September 1, while casting serious doubt on ever playing Wonder Woman again. The $70 million production used AI for sets and lighting; Gadot says her lawyers spent six months making sure the technology could not alter her acting. She also told Ynet that disappearing into another Wonder Woman shoot no longer works with four children in different schools. For film readers, the two declarations belong together: Gadot will accept a production system built to remove physical work from the frame, but she has nearly closed the door on the role that made her a franchise star.

Gal Gadot protects her performance, but AI gets the room

Gadot’s defence of Bitcoin contains a boundary sharp enough to cut paper. AI can make the sets. AI can handle the lighting. AI cannot touch Gal Gadot.

“This was the longest contract I have ever worked on,” she said on Josh Horowitz’s Happy Sad Confused podcast, according to TheWrap. Her lawyers spent six months considering ways the technology might interfere with her performance. Gadot said SAG later contacted them for advice on protections for other actors.

That legal marathon gives the game away. The sales pitch says inevitability; the contract says danger. Gadot told Horowitz that she fears AI but refuses to look away from it. “The train has left the station,” she said. Work with the technology, in her formulation, or wind up “out of the game completely.”

You can admire the candour and still notice who bought a ticket and who may end up beneath the wheels. The A.V. Club characterized the production’s AI use as replacing work normally done by set and lighting crews. Gadot insisted that Bitcoin employed a large crew. The reporting does not give a department-by-department count, so it does not settle how many jobs the system kept, changed or removed.

Gal Gadot at the 2018 Comic Con International, for "Wonder Woman 1984", San Diego, California.

Photo: Gage Skidmore · CC BY-SA 2.0 · source

Doug Liman’s $70 million gray box promises 200 locations

The cast — Gadot, Casey Affleck, Pete Davidson and Isla Fisher — worked inside a former car showroom lined with gray screen, according to Yahoo. The production called it the “gray box.” Actors never travelled to the story’s roughly 200 locations; backgrounds and lighting came later.

How this piece was made

Editorial standards →

Editorial feature

A CinePixo feature whose more specific reporting or utility method has not been claimed.

In this piece

  • Casey Affleck
    Casey Affleckfilm producer
  • Gal Gadot
    Gal Gadotbeauty pageant contestant
  • Wonder Woman poster

In this piece

  1. 01Gal Gadot protects her performance, but AI gets the room
  2. 02Doug Liman’s $70 million gray box promises 200 locations
  3. 03Bitcoin reopens the Craig Wright argument Hollywood cannot settle
  4. 04Wonder Woman no longer fits Gadot’s life

Producer Ryan Kavanaugh claims a conventional shoot would have cost more than $300 million, Yahoo reported, putting the claimed saving above $200 million. TheWrap reported that the production shot for 20 days on a custom soundstage and cost $70 million. Those savings come from the filmmakers, not an independent audit.

Gadot liked the speed. Without conventional lighting changes, she said, the actors could continue for ten hours and stay emotionally warm. She compared the near-empty space to theatre and called the process pure. Then came the useful pinprick: she had not seen a single shot.

So nobody should describe the finished result yet, including Gadot. The movie may look miraculous, synthetic or like a cryptocurrency advert trapped inside a screensaver. At present, it is a costly promise rendered in gray.

Kenneth Lonergan, Michelle Williams, Casey Affleck and four producers of Manchester by the Sea at the European premiere Gal Gadot speaking at the 2018 San Diego Comic Con International, for "Wonder Woman 1984", at the San Diego Convention Center in San Diego, California.

Photos: Bex Walton from London, England · CC BY 2.0 · source; Gage Skidmore · CC BY-SA 2.0 · source

Bitcoin reopens the Craig Wright argument Hollywood cannot settle

The technology is only half the combustible package. Cointribune reports that the film follows Gadot as a journalist investigating Craig Wright, with Affleck playing Wright and Davidson playing his longtime supporter Calvin Ayre. The outlet says the story favors Wright’s claim that he created Bitcoin under the name Satoshi Nakamoto, and that Ayre helped finance the film.

A British court rejected Wright’s claim in 2024 and found that documents supporting his case had been forged, as Cointribune reported. A feature film cannot reverse that judgment. It can, however, package a rejected account with stars, chases and handsome digital weather until an old falsehood acquires the posture of entertainment.

Cointribune also reported that the film had no confirmed US distributor as of September 4. That leaves its reach unknown. The filmmakers have built a globe-trotting thriller without globetrotting; they have not yet secured the final trip into American cinemas.

A producer, Michelle Williams and Casey Affleck at the Manchester by the Sea premiere Gal Gadot speaking at the 2018 San Diego Comic Con International, for "Wonder Woman 1984", at the San Diego Convention Center in San Diego, California.

Photos: Bex Walton from London, England · CC BY 2.0 · source; Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America · CC BY-SA 2.0 · source

Wonder Woman no longer fits Gadot’s life

Gadot told Ynet that another Wonder Woman production may demand more time away than she will now give. With four children attending different schools, she said, checking out of family life for an extended shoot “doesn’t work for my life anymore.” This is not a formal retirement announcement. It is a practical refusal with very little cape left fluttering in it.

She also criticized DC’s treatment of director Patty Jenkins and former Superman actor Henry Cavill during the studio transition, calling neither case elegant, according to Ynet. TheWrap reported that Gadot said DC Studios chiefs James Gunn and Peter Safran had asked her to return for a third film, but she had watched how others were handled.

There is the reversal worth keeping. Wonder Woman, a physical production whose boots Gadot wore across several films, now asks too much of her life. Bitcoin, shot in a gray room with the world added afterward, offers ten uninterrupted hours of acting and a contract that walls off her face, voice and gestures. The future, apparently, arrives as an empty car showroom — and six months of lawyers deciding which parts of you may enter it.

Wonder Woman
2017 · Patty Jenkins
  • The Game posterThe Game1997 · David Fincher
  • Sources

    1. 01cointribune.com · https://www.cointribune.com/en/bitcoin-the-70-million-film-thats-stirring-up-the-satoshi-debate-all-over-again/
    2. 02yahoo.com · https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/movies/articles/gal-gadot-defends-ai-bitcoin-143955880.html
    3. 03msn.com · https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/celebrities/gal-gadot-defends-ai-film-as-she-rules-out-returning-to-wonder-woman/ar-AA2bjGKT
    4. 04consequence.net · https://consequence.net/2026/09/gal-gadot-ai-movie-bitcoin-doug-liman/
    5. 05avclub.com · https://www.avclub.com/gal-gadot-ai-movie-bitcoin
    6. 06soapcentral.com · https://www.soapcentral.com/entertainment/news-her-defense-chatgpt-internet-reacts-gal-gadot-justifies-use-ai-sets-lighting-upcoming-film-bitcoin
    7. 07thewrap.com · https://www.thewrap.com/creative-content/movies/gal-gadot-defends-ai-enhanced-movie-bitcoin/
    8. 08ynetnews.com · https://www.ynetnews.com/culture/article/h1euc1ndge

    Every factual claim above is drawn from these. The reading of them is ours.

    Gal Gadot AI Bitcoin movieGal Gadot Wonder Woman returnDoug Liman Bitcoin Killing SatoshiBitcoin movie AI sets and lightingGal Gadot Happy Sad Confused interviewCraig Wright Satoshi movie controversy

    5 min read

    ShareXFacebookThreads
    Dorothy Kwan

    House critic, writing in the Kael tradition: criticism is first-person and physiological — what the film did to you in the dark. Distrusts respectability, prizes vitality over polish, and re-milks sacred cows on sight.

    Full profile and all work →

    Also written about Casey Affleck

    • Gal Gadot’s Bitcoin AI Defense Sells Speed, Not CertaintySep 1, 2026

    More The Argument

    All of it →
    The Argument

    Tilly Norwood’s CNN Interview Exposes the Limits of AI Acting

    Hollywood’s first AI actor says she is “not the enemy,” then stalls when CNN asks her to perform without a prompt. The exchange makes the sales pitch around Particle6’s film Misaligned look less like a revolution than a production workflow with a face.

    Dorothy Kwan·Sep 10, 2026

    The Argument

    Danny Boyle’s ‘Ink’ Uses AI for 30 Seconds—and Owns the Choice

    Danny Boyle confirmed at Telluride that generative AI appears in roughly 30 seconds of ‘Ink,’ including animated archival photographs and newsroom mice. The film reaches U.S. cinemas in December before its Netflix debut in January 2027.

    Dorothy Kwan·Sep 9, 2026

    The Argument

    Resident Evil Sequel Plans Stop at Zach Cregger’s Ideas—for Now

    Zach Cregger can imagine another trip to Raccoon City, but no sequel is official. First, his original hero must face moviegoers—and fans still waiting for Leon Kennedy.

    Marcus Reid·Sep 7, 2026

    The Argument

    Paul Schrader Blames an AI Cast on Black Actors Rejecting His Noir

    Schrader says Black actors passed on ‘Three Guns at Dawn’ because its major Black characters were criminals. His answer was to replace the performers, not revise the roles.

    Dorothy Kwan·Sep 7, 2026