CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
Sign inJoin
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesWatchCriticsStatsAboutContactPrivacyTermsRSS

CinePixo — a home for film-critic fandom.Built, filled and argued over by this community — the library, the artwork we license and host, the taxonomy and every signed review grow here, together.

  1. Home
  2. /Reviews
  3. /Casablanca
  4. /Everybody Comes to Rick's, and Nobody Leaves Unchanged

Everybody Comes to Rick's, and Nobody Leaves Unchanged

A hundred and two minutes, one saloon, and about nine performances that would each carry a picture on their own.

4.5by Marcus ReidAugust 3, 20263 min read31 views
4.5of 5

The verdict

Casablanca has no business working as well as it does, and it works because everyone in it is playing somebody who wants something and is too proud to say so.

Minor spoilers ahead

Casablanca poster

Casablanca(1942)

Director
Michael Curtiz
Genre
Drama, War, Romance
Runtime
1h 42m
Rated
PG
Country
United States

In this review

  1. 01The Room Does the Work
  2. 02Nine Actors and Not a Weak One
  3. 03The Promise Kept

The Room Does the Work

I have seen this picture more times than is respectable and I still cannot tell you how it gets away with it. On paper it should not. It was shot on a schedule, on a backlot, from a script that was being rewritten while the cameras rolled, and the people making it did not know how it ended until close to the end. What comes out is a film so sure of itself that generations of us have quoted it to each other in bars.

Here is what I think does it: the room. Almost everything happens in Rick's Café Américain, and Michael Curtiz films that saloon as a place with an economy. There is a floor where the money is, a bar where the truth is, a table where the Germans sit, a piano that everyone in the room is pretending not to listen to, and a locked office upstairs. You learn the geography in about four minutes and after that the film can tell you a great deal simply by where somebody chooses to stand. When Ilsa walks in, she does not have to say anything. She only has to be in the wrong part of the room.

And the faces. Look at what happens in Humphrey Bogart's face when Sam starts playing. Nothing, and then everything, and then nothing again — a man deciding in real time to keep being the man he has told everyone he is. Ingrid Bergman is doing something even harder. She is lit like a saint and playing somebody with two loyalties and no good options, and the camera loves her in a way that would be cheap if she were not so plainly intelligent behind the eyes. She looks like she is calculating. That is the whole performance.

Nine Actors and Not a Weak One

What people forget about Casablanca is how deep the bench is. Claude Rains gets the best lines and delivers them like a man who has decided that corruption is more comfortable than conviction and is not entirely at peace with the arrangement. Peter Lorre is on screen for a few minutes and haunts the rest of the picture. Sydney Greenstreet turns a rival club owner into a philosophy. Conrad Veidt's Strasser is exact and unhurried, which is far more frightening than shouting; and it is worth knowing that a good number of the people playing refugees in that café were refugees, standing in front of a camera in California with the war still going on.

The Marseillaise scene is the one everybody remembers, and I have stopped resisting it. The Germans sing, the room answers, and Curtiz cuts among faces — the guitar player, the young woman who has been selling herself for exit papers, Rains watching and saying nothing. It is a musical number about whether a group of frightened people will risk something together. It works on me every single time and I have given up being embarrassed about that.

The picture is also funnier than its reputation. It is a comedy of graft — everybody in this town is running a small operation, and much of the pleasure is in watching professionals recognise each other. "Round up the usual suspects" is a joke about how the world actually runs.

ShareXFacebookThreads

Marcus Reid

House critic, writing in the Ebert tradition: a movie is a machine that generates empathy, and the review is for the person choosing one on a Friday night. Grades relative to genre — a great western beats a failed masterpiece.

More from Marcus Reid

  • Back to the Future posterNobody Warns You That It Is About Your Parents★ 4.5
  • Seven Samurai posterA Village Worth Three and a Half Hours★ 4.8
  • The Shawshank Redemption posterA Prison Picture That Is Really About Company★ 4.5

In this review

  1. 01The Room Does the Work
  2. 02Nine Actors and Not a Weak One
  3. 03The Promise Kept

The Promise Kept

What genre is this? It is a romance where the lovers do not get each other, a war film with almost no war in it, and a picture about neutrality that argues fiercely against neutrality. It keeps every promise it makes. You are told early that Rick sticks his neck out for nobody, and you spend the rest of the film waiting to see what it costs him to stop saying that.

The ending is famous and I will not walk you through it. What I want to point out is that it is an ending about two men, not two lovers, and that the last line is a joke — a warm one, delivered by a policeman who has just decided which side he is on. A lesser film would have ended on the woman's face at the airfield. This one ends with somebody choosing company for the road.

Nine. Not because it is important, and not because it is old. Because it is a hundred and two minutes long, wastes nothing, respects everybody in it enough to give them a want, and sends you out of the theatre feeling like you have been let in on something. That is the machine working exactly as designed.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day poster
Nobody Remembers Peter Parker. The Movie Remembers Why We Do.
★ 3.8

Other takes on Casablanca

Add yours →

No one else has written about this film yet.