CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
Sign inJoin
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesWatchCriticsStatsAboutContactPrivacyTermsRSS

CinePixo — a home for film-critic fandom.Built, filled and argued over by this community — the library, the artwork we license and host, the taxonomy and every signed review grow here, together.

  1. Home
  2. /Reviews
  3. /The Dark Knight
  4. /A Bat-Signal With Teeth Marks

A Bat-Signal With Teeth Marks

The movie is most alive when it stops polishing its myth and lets chaos put its boots on the table.

4.0by Dorothy KwanJune 20, 20264 min read600 views
4.0of 5

The verdict

Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight is a grand, bruising crime picture that sometimes mistakes solemnity for depth, but it has Heath Ledger’s Joker tearing holes in the screen, and holes are what this movie needs.

The Dark Knight poster

The Dark Knight(2008)

Director
Christopher Nolan
Genre
Drama, Action, Crime, Thriller
Runtime
2h 32m
Rated
PG-13
Country
United Kingdom, United States of America

In this review

  1. 01The Jolt in the Dark
  2. 02Respectability With a Cape
  3. 03The Big Serious Funhouse

The Jolt in the Dark

I went into The Dark Knight expecting machinery, and for a while that is exactly what it gives you: sleek, expensive machinery, all pistons and moral upholstery. Christopher Nolan loves a system. He loves men explaining the system. He loves a city that can be diagrammed on glass by grave professionals in suits. Gotham here is less a place than a pressure chamber, and Nolan keeps tightening the bolts until you can hear the audience stop rustling. That is no small thing. In 2008, when comic-book movies were still trying to look respectable without looking embalmed, this one arrived wearing a black tie and hiding a switchblade.

The opening bank robbery is a corker: hard, clean, nasty, with masked criminals chewing through one another like capitalism got a punchline. It has the snap of a good heist picture, the kind where each cut seems to say, keep up. Then Ledger appears, and the movie’s temperature changes. Not because he is “dark” or “iconic” or any of the other museum-label words that have been pasted onto the performance until you can barely see it. He is funny. That is the thing. He licks his lips, hunches forward, drags his voice through gravel and nursery rhyme, and suddenly the film’s big moral architecture has a vandal in the lobby. He plays the Joker as if thought itself gives him hives. He is always reacting to a private joke, and the joke is civilization.

This is where the movie goes through you. Not in the speeches, not in the big ethical dilemmas Nolan and Jonathan Nolan arrange like silverware, but in the little shocks: the Joker clapping in a jail cell, his grotesque politeness, the way he seems to insult every room by entering it. He makes the other characters look over-prepared, which is not a flaw so much as the movie’s secret subject.

Respectability With a Cape

Christian Bale’s Batman is a fascinating near-miss. As Bruce Wayne, he is sharp enough, with that billionaire smirk worn like a rented tuxedo. As Batman, he is an idea with a sore throat. The voice still sounds like a man trying to frighten a parking garage. But Bale understands the prison of the role: Batman can’t be loose, can’t be sexy, can’t even really be witty. He is burden made muscular. The movie keeps asking whether a symbol can stay pure once it has to do business with flesh-and-blood people, and Bale’s stiffness becomes part of the answer.

Aaron Eckhart, as Harvey Dent, gives the film its civic gleam. He has the square jaw and campaign-ready smile, but also a useful impatience, a hint that goodness may enjoy its own reflection. Gary Oldman’s Gordon is all tired decency and mustache, a man who looks as if bureaucracy has been sleeping on his chest. Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman bring warmth from the adult table; they are so deft they can make exposition sound like concern. Maggie Gyllenhaal is a major improvement over the decorative vacancy these movies might have settled for. She gives Rachel Dawes a wary intelligence, though the movie still hems her in with men’s destinies.

ShareXFacebookThreads

Dorothy Kwan

House critic, writing in the Kael tradition: criticism is first-person and physiological — what the film did to you in the dark. Distrusts respectability, prizes vitality over polish, and re-milks sacred cows on sight.

More from Dorothy Kwan

  • In the Mood for Love posterDesire in the Space Between Two Doorways★ 4.5
  • Moana posterA Good Song in a Very Expensive Echo★ 3.3
  • The Fox and the Hound posterThe Nicest Cruel Movie Disney Ever Made★ 3.8
  • Fight Club poster

In this review

  1. 01The Jolt in the Dark
  2. 02Respectability With a Cape
  3. 03The Big Serious Funhouse

Nolan’s great gift is momentum, and his weakness is that he does not trust it. The action has a muscular city-scale heft: trucks flip, glass shatters, bodies slam into hard surfaces. The IMAX sequences have a clean vertical thrill, like the movie suddenly remembered movies are pictures. But then come the lectures. Oh, the lectures. Everybody has a thesis. Everybody knows what Gotham represents. You begin to feel that if a bus ran over someone, the bus would pause to explain escalation.

Still, the picture rarely goes dead. It threatens to, whenever it climbs onto the courthouse steps of its own seriousness, but Ledger keeps dragging it back into the alley. He gives the film vulgar life, and vulgar life is what saves prestige from becoming taxidermy.

The Big Serious Funhouse

What is strange and exciting about The Dark Knight is that it wants to be both a pulp nightmare and a political tragedy, and it nearly pulls off the contradiction by refusing to wink. There is no camp exit. No bright release valve. Nolan treats the comic-book premise as if it were a crime epic with a mask problem, and that straight-faced pressure can be thrilling. You feel the city’s nerves fray. You feel institutions turning brittle. You feel, in the best scenes, that order is a story people tell each other so they can sleep.

But let’s not pretend the movie is immaculate. It is too long at 153 minutes, and sometimes its moral tests have the diagrammatic neatness of a graduate seminar conducted during a car chase. Nolan can be powerful and a little airless at the same time. He stages chaos beautifully but explains it as if worried you didn’t bring a notebook. The late movements, which I won’t spell out, go for tragic grandeur, and they land with force, though not without a few fingerprints from the director nudging us toward awe.

And yet: what a thing to have in a superhero movie, this much appetite, this much dread, this much nasty comic velocity. The Dark Knight is not great because it transcends the genre; that is the snob’s compliment, and it smells funny. It is great because it infects the genre with crime-movie venom and then lets one performer run around with the antidote and the poison in the same pocket. I don’t revere it. Reverence is how movies get sealed in glass. I felt it kick. I felt it overreach. I felt it swagger, stumble, recover, and grin with a mouth full of knives.

Rating: 8.0/10

Soap, Insomnia, and the Best Bad Idea of 1999
★ 4.3

Other takes on The Dark Knight

Add yours →

No one else has written about this film yet.