CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
Sign inJoin
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesPeopleTopicsCriticsStats
CinePixo
ReviewsOff CameraMoviesWatchCriticsStatsAboutContactPrivacyTermsRSS

CinePixo — a home for film-critic fandom.Built, filled and argued over by this community — the library, the artwork we license and host, the taxonomy and every signed review grow here, together.

  1. Home
  2. /Reviews
  3. /In the Mood for Love
  4. /Desire in the Space Between Two Doorways

Desire in the Space Between Two Doorways

Wong Kar-wai does not preserve an elegant romance under glass. He crowds it with neighbors, clocks, rain, noodle runs and two stars whose smallest movements make good behavior feel dangerous.

4.5by Dorothy KwanAugust 14, 20263 min read22 views
4.5of 5

The verdict

In the Mood for Love turns restraint into a physical sensation: every hallway is too narrow, every song returns too soon, and every glance arrives carrying the touch the film withholds.

In the Mood for Love poster

In the Mood for Love(2000)

花樣年華

Director
Wong Kar-wai
Genre
Drama, Romance
Runtime
1h 38m
Rated
PG
Country
Thailand, Hong Kong, France

In this review

  1. 01The walls are in on it
  2. 02Repetition with a pulse
  3. 03The movie refuses to touch for us

The walls are in on it

People talk about In the Mood for Love as if it were a porcelain object: exquisite, untouchable, the respectable movie you put on a shelf after praising the dresses. That makes it sound dead. Wong Kar-wai's film is feverish. It sweats through its collars. It sends Mrs. Chan and Mr. Chow down the same cramped staircase for noodles, again and again, until repetition becomes contact. The walls squeeze them together while manners insist on distance. You feel the contradiction in your shoulders.

Maggie Cheung does more with the angle of her neck than most actors manage with a confession. Her cheongsams are famous, and rightly so, but they are not museum pieces. Their high collars and exact seams make composure visible as work. Tony Leung Chiu-wai answers with stillness of his own, a face that seems relaxed until the eyes reveal how much calculation is going into the calm. When the two discover that their spouses are having an affair, the movie refuses the easy release of outrage. They begin rehearsing how it might have happened. A question becomes a scene; a scene becomes an intimacy neither of them can safely name.

The boarding house is full of people, food and noise. Privacy has to be stolen in fragments. A neighbor can appear at any moment. A landlady can turn a casual question into surveillance. Wong shoots through doorframes, around corners and past foreground objects, making us feel both like confidants and eavesdroppers. The romance does not bloom despite the social world. It takes its shape from the pressure of being watched.

Repetition with a pulse

That Nat King Cole song returns, and returns, and returns. In a lesser picture the repetition would underline an emotion already delivered by the actors. Here it changes time. The same walk down a corridor is not the same walk once desire has been admitted to the room. Slow motion lets fabric, cigarette smoke and a passing shoulder acquire weight without pretending that any of them is a symbol in a lecture. The film knows that wanting someone makes ordinary objects insolent. A wall is suddenly too close. A clock is suddenly personal.

Wong was making the picture without a conventional fixed script, and the finished film retains the nervous freedom of discovery while looking obsessively controlled. That combination is its kick. The compositions trap the characters, but the performances keep threatening to escape them. Cheung can turn a pause into accusation, then soften it before the other person can answer. Leung's smile arrives as a defense and leaves as a wound. Their scenes do not climb toward one grand declaration. They circle, retreat and try again.

I laughed more than the film's reputation had prepared me to. The role-playing has a dry awkwardness; the neighbors possess the comic terror of people who are always available when you need them least. That humor prevents the longing from becoming perfumed misery. These are adults trying to remain decent and discovering that decency can hurt other people too, especially themselves.

ShareXFacebookThreads

Dorothy Kwan

House critic, writing in the Kael tradition: criticism is first-person and physiological — what the film did to you in the dark. Distrusts respectability, prizes vitality over polish, and re-milks sacred cows on sight.

More from Dorothy Kwan

  • Moana posterA Good Song in a Very Expensive Echo★ 3.3
  • The Fox and the Hound posterThe Nicest Cruel Movie Disney Ever Made★ 3.8
  • Fight Club posterSoap, Insomnia, and the Best Bad Idea of 1999★ 4.3

In this review

  1. 01The walls are in on it
  2. 02Repetition with a pulse
  3. 03The movie refuses to touch for us

The movie refuses to touch for us

The easiest version of this story would reward patience with possession. Wong is after the sensation before possession, the interval in which a hand might move and does not. His cuts do not complete gestures. They leave us carrying them. Even the music seems to return because the previous scene failed to spend all of its feeling.

There are viewers who find this frustrating, and the frustration is not a failure of attention. It is the experience the film has built. You become hungry for the release that conventional romance trains you to expect, then notice how cheaply most movies provide it. In the Mood for Love makes restraint erotic without calling pain noble. The cost remains on Cheung's face and in Leung's lowered eyes.

Forget the glass case. This movie has a pulse, and it is embarrassingly close to the surface. It gets into you through the repeated song, the damp street, the click of a heel and the half-second when two people occupy the same narrow doorway. Then it steps back before you can call that distance beautiful.

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly poster
Two Hours of Squinting and I Loved Every Minute
★ 4.3

Other takes on In the Mood for Love

Add yours →

No one else has written about this film yet.